robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/11/open-letter-to-harry-reid.html
sent by
Sparrows since 7 days 10 hours 22 minutes, published about 6 days 7 hours 11 minutes
I know you're in a tough spot. It would be bad enough if you only had to get Ben Nelson, Evan Bayh, Mary Landrieu, and Blanche Lincoln on board, but anyone who has to kiss Joe Lieberman's derriere deserves a congressional medal of honor. But Harry, you really need to take on future health-care costs. The House bill fails to do this. The public option in the House bill is open only to people without employer-provided health insurance. That will be too small a number to have bargaining clout to get good deals from drug companies and medical providers. And it will mainly attract people who have more expensive medical needs, which is why the Congressional Budget Office decided it would cost more than it would save. You also know a public insurance option that's open to everyone would cut future health costs dramatically by imposing real competition on private for-profit insurance plans. That's why the private insurers hate the idea. Even if states were allowed to opt out of this robust public option, the big states would almost certainly opt in, giving it the scale needed to negotiate great deals from drug companies and medical providers. This would put pressure on any state that opted out because their citizens would soon discover they're paying far more. [Note: Good suggestions, even if I don't agree with everything this author says.]
comments
When Democrats balked and threatened to block an odious Bush judicial appointment through the filibuster, Republicans played hard-ball and threatened the nuclear option - to get rid of the filibuster. Democrats (led by Joe Lieberman) folded. Why can't Democrats play that same game? Why must Democrats now stick to soft-ball rules?
There are even alternatives that fall short of getting rid of the filibuster. The margin needed for cloture could be reduced from 60 to perhaps 55, for example. Changing the rules takes only a simple majority.
At the very least, Harry Reid could insist that the Republicans and Blue-dogs stand up at the podium 24 hours a day (with no bathroom breaks) reading from a phone book or whatever. At least that would be good theater that would ensure the public knows exactly who the obstructionists were who kept them from having health care.
Because it's the Democrats' job to make Progressive promises and then preemptively surrender to the corporations.
If they didn't have the filibuster they'd find another excuse.