A Nun Speaks Out On the H1N1 Pandemic: "The WHO Changed the Official Definition of a Pandemic"

I'm a doctor of medicine and in 2006 I published the study Crimes and Abuses of the Pharmaceutical Industry. - Last May, WHO changed the official definition of a pandemic -- it changed from a logical definition (a pandemic is an infection of global proportions and with a high mortality) to an illogical definition (a pandemic is an infection of global proportions). -- What are the consequences of this change? -- Under the new definition of "pandemic", the annual [seasonal] flu more than meets the requirements to be one. Are we going to declare a world health alert every fall? Besides absurdity from the scientific standpoint, this has serious financial and policy consequences. -- You don't trust the vaccine. Why? - Unlike the annual seasonal flu vaccine, the influenza vaccine contains such powerful adjuvant substances that they can get the normal immune response to multiply by a factor of 10. In addition, two doses are recommended, to be received after the injection for seasonal influenza, which also contains adjuvants, although less potent. - Never before have these substances been injected three times in a row in the general population, starting with children, the chronically ill and pregnant women. --- What effects can result? - The artificial stimulation of the immune system can cause autoimmune diseases.
3 commentscategory: Health and Wellness karma: 149

comments

  1. #1    The official definition of pandemic always has been as follows:

    Definition of Pandemic

    Pandemic: An epidemic (a sudden outbreak) that becomes very widespread and affects a whole region, a continent, or the world.

    By contrast:

    * An epidemic affects more than the expected number of cases of disease occurring in a community or region during a given period of time. A sudden severe outbreak within a region or a group as, for example, AIDS in Africa or AIDS in intravenous drug users.
    * An endemic is present in a community at all times but in low frequency. An endemic is continuous as in the case of malaria in some areas of the world or as with illicit drugs in some neighborhoo...

    » ver todo el comentario
    written by Vierotchka since 6 days 8 hours 42 minutesVierotchka
  2. #2    I agree with Vierotchka. When I learnt epidemiology, the severity or mortality of a pandemic was never an issue. If it was an epidemic tjhat affected more than one area or nation, it was a pandemic, no matter how innocuous the disease.
    written by Fiore since 6 days 6 hours 3 minutesFiore
  3. #3    This article is a bit shocking, but the video of Sister Teresa Forcades is pretty incredible. (She is an internist and has a PhD in public health.) In the video, she lays out what seems to me to be credible, well-documented, and devastating accusations against Baxter Pharmaceuticals and WHO (World Health Organization). I watched 20 minutes of what is apparently a 60-minute authoritative statement. Here's the video: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15980. I applaud and admire her insights and courage.
    written by ThinkandDo since 6 days 4 hours 59 minutesThinkandDo
closed comments

who are we
code: license, download  |  images license
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional    Valid CSS!   [Valid RSS]