Dozens of Architects, Building Professionals See and Hear the Explosive Evidence

Jonathan Cole PE: "The 2009 AIA "Architecture Exchange" (ArchEX) East convention held in Richmond, VA, November 5-6 had more than 110 exhibitors, most representing building products and services. AE911Truth's 950 A/E petition signers were quite well represented in our booth by the volunteer team I assembled for the event. We were doing what we do best: disseminating scientific information and facts about the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11. ... we outlined why the official story fails to explain key evidence and conflicts with fundamental laws of physics. NIST failed to even address the implications of the acceleration rate of the three building's descents, the energy necessary for the pulverization of concrete and the high-speed horizontal ejections of steel, the heat needed to create the iron spheroids, and of course failed to explain the nanothermite found in the dust — having refused to even look for it or any other explosive residues. One architect said the outer walls of WTC 1 and WTC 2 peeled away like a banana and the "collapse" looked "normal" to him.... One of the architects who signed the petition was very familiar with the Twin Towers, having "worked on original drawings for towers as a student in the 60's.... 25 saw enough evidence to sign the petition right then and there, including five degreed and licensed architects.""
1 commentscategory: Abuse of Power/Corruption karma: 165

comments

  1. #1    What we saw on 911 was exploding buildings, using unfamiliar technology. It looked like an implosion, yes - but it looked like an explosion too. Under the influence of Shock and Awe, we seized the blatantly canned explanation we were offered for an event we couldn't quite categorize. Within hours the 'authorities' seemed to know all about a plot they claimed they could not possibly have known about ahead of time. We stifled our doubts. How could there have been no national defense response? Why did the collapses look so much like implosions, albeit with explosive components (equally hard to understand, if gravity was doing all the work)? Why was there no real crime site investigation...

    » ver todo el comentario
    written by epppie since 7 days 12 hours 21 minutesepppie
closed comments

who are we
code: license, download  |  images license
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional    Valid CSS!   [Valid RSS]