www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/opinion/08sun1.html?th&emc=th
sent by
Fiore since 12 days 22 hours 10 minutes, published about 12 days 17 hours 16 minutes
Unemployment surged from 9.8 percent in September to 10.2 percent last month, its highest level since 1983. At the same time, the economy lost 190,000 more jobs. That means employers have eliminated 7.3 million positions since the recession began in December 2007. As dreadful as they are, the headline numbers understate the severity of the problem. They also obscure an even grimmer fact: Unless there is more government support, it will take several years of robust economic growth — by no means a sure thing — to recoup the jobs that have been lost. The unemployment rate includes only jobless people who have looked for work in the past four weeks. [T]he numbers paint this stark picture: At no time in post-World War II America has it been more difficult to find a job, to plan for the future, or — for tens of millions of Americans — to merely get by.
comments
> Using the U3 is a blatant lie.
U-3 Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate)
This is the number of people receiving unemployment checks. They have no other way to track. Once you stop receiving checks, you are not included in the U3 - see U6
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for
economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers
This number is closer to the truth. In October this was 17.5%
http://www.onepennysheet.com./cat-test/unemployment/
But John Williams is probably even closer to reality at 22% for October
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data
That's the truth. The "recovery" is some nice stock market slight-of-hand.
....although it is obvious to anyone with two working brain cells, that Mr. obama has ABDICATED his leadership position to those very market scammers, con-men, and sleigh-of-hand fraudsters.