www.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/opinion/06krugman.html
sent by
RicKelis since 16 days 4 hours 46 minutes, published about 15 days 21 hours 15 minutes
Remember those Republican boasts that they would turn health care into President Obama’s Waterloo? Well, exit polls suggest that to the extent that health care was an issue in Tuesday’s elections, it worked in Democrats’ favor. But while health care won’t be Mr. Obama’s Waterloo, economic policy is starting to look like his Anzio. There was a national element to the election. Voters across America are in a bad mood, largely because of the still-grim economic situation. This bodes ill for the Democrats in the midterm elections next year — not because voters will reject their agenda, but because all indications are that a year from now unemployment will still be painfully high. Which brings me to the Anzio analogy.The World War II battle of Anzio was a classic example of the perils of being too cautious. The stimulus bill fell far short of what many economists considered appropriate. And more is needed. Yes, the economy grew fairly fast in the third quarter — but not fast enough to make significant progress on jobs. If the Democrats lose badly in the midterms, the talking heads will say that Mr. Obama tried to do too much, this is a center-right nation, and so on. But the truth is that Mr. Obama put his agenda at risk by doing too little. The fateful decision, early this year, to go for economic half-measures may haunt Democrats for years to come.
comments
Krugman: "Voters across America are in a bad mood" - no shit! No wonder this guy won the Nobel Prize in economics. We are not in a bad mood because of amything Obama has done - we are in a bad mood because there are no friggin jobs out there, and the ones that are out there pay like crap. We are in a bad mood because there is nothing going on right now that makes Americans feel good about the state of the financial and housing sectors either - but this too, this too shall pass.
Just like Custer, Obama is going to find himself surrounded and outnumbered, too far from his support for timely rescue. One can only hope that Custer realized his shortcomings as his command was decimated. There are no indications that Obama will so realize his as his nation is returned to Republican control.
geithner bernanke summers
no change
afghanistan iraq pakistan iran columbia
no change
banks before people
no change
balking on real climate laws
no change
rendition into torturer's hands
no change
secret surveillance of our phone and mail
no change
response to every lawsuit filed by patriotic Americans to reveal past crimes is 'state secret'
no change
the corporate democrats will indeed get their comupance- their waterloo, their anzio, their little big horn - - there aint a dimes worth of difference between the powerful in power and the powerful out of power -
...hey - - right across from this dialogue box is an ad f...
» ver todo el comentario
As for #6, why do you believe that the Democrats forcing everyone's health premiums to skyrocket will help the Rethugs? Quite the reverse.
The recent elections show that plenty of Americans, and especially American youth, have already given up on an administration that's broken more promises than the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Krugman is a propagandist economist for Obama. Obama was never meant to see the light. When we come to understand that Obama was the first play in a Wall Street game to cheat the public (and yes, everything hung on his winning, that is why they masked the bigwigs voting for him and made it appear his winning was grassroots when it wasn't) and we bought it. Just like "they" knew we would.